yinsq2000
发表于 2010-3-11 13:45:47
jameszlm
发表于 2010-3-11 14:29:22
本帖最后由 jameszlm 于 2010-3-11 14:32 编辑
杭州电信百兆光纤
Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 114.80.67.1
Pinging 114.80.67.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 114.80.67.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=115
Reply from 114.80.67.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=115
Reply from 114.80.67.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=115
Reply from 114.80.67.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 114.80.67.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 5ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=108
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=108
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=108
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=108
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 78ms
nickson
发表于 2010-3-11 15:36:21
ping 不通，我单位是10M电信光纤接入。
白领流氓
发表于 2010-3-11 16:14:44
我在天津联通，现在用的100M独享光纤做测试，ping联通服务器延时有点高。感觉应该在10以内才好。可能因为服务器在南方，跳数比较多吧。分别作了不同大小包的ping测试，效果不错。比较稳定！
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 39ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 1000
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 1000 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=1000 time=38ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=1000 time=39ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=1000 time=40ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=1000 time=41ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 39ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 2000
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 2000 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=2000 time=38ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=2000 time=38ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=2000 time=39ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 3, Received = 3, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 38ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 3000
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 3000 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=3000 time=42ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=3000 time=44ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 2, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 43ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 65532
Bad value for option -l, valid range is from 0 to 65500.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 65500
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 65500 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=159ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=166ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 148ms, Maximum = 166ms, Average = 155ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
白领流氓
发表于 2010-3-11 16:18:49
Ping联通服务器，最大包100次测试结果
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 60.29.232.1 -l 65500 -n 100
Pinging 60.29.232.1 with 65500 bytes of data:
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=155ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=157ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=157ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=155ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=158ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=162ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=155ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=162ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=154ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=155ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=156ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=158ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=147ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=149ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=148ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=164ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=150ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=151ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=152ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=153ms TTL=115
Reply from 60.29.232.1: bytes=65500 time=155ms TTL=115
Ping statistics for 60.29.232.1:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 99, Lost = 1 (1% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 164ms, Average = 151ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
老大最好让ICD那边放一个大点的文件，我们做一下下载压力测试。
stonenew
发表于 2010-3-11 17:10:56
我在嘉定电信。
yaner_chen
发表于 2010-3-11 21:06:06
北方联通：66-75MS，无丢包
南方电信：9-10MS，无丢包
上海杨浦 电信2M
绿城愚翁
发表于 2010-3-11 21:17:47
那两个都是找不到服务器。
新版明锐
发表于 2010-4-15 16:43:56
土版考虑很周到。